Wednesday, December 2, 2009

World Cup Draw Preview

This Friday at 9:00am Pacific time, the iniquitous bureaucrats from FIFA, along with a handful of celebs and pols, will get together in Cape Town, South Africa for the once-every-four-years ritual known as the World Cup Draw.

This horrendously boring event, which can be cringe-inducing in its mock seriousness and cheese factor, involves grown men and women drawing 32 balls (representing the qualified teams) from 4 glass pots and placing them into eight groups. To punch it up, there are lots of speeches and terrible musical performances. Despite this, the draw, which is televised in 170 countries, is expected to be watched by almost 200 million human beings.

Why? Because the draw matters. Matters, at least, to the billion or so people who care about the sport of football and its ultimate tournament, the World Cup. The aspirations of teams and nations to footballing glory will hang, in some measure, on the result of the draw.

FIFA announced the seeding for the tournament today and produced a first surprise: they abandoned the tradition of seeding based on performance in the last two World Cups and went with FIFA rankings as of October 2009. On this basis, France were excluded from one of the top seedings (which prevent the best teams from eliminating each other in the first round); while Holland moved into France's spot.

The #1 seeds will be spread out across the 8 groups, and include hosts South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, England, Holland, Germany, Italy, and Spain. No arguments there. Excluding France was extremely fair, given their poor form of late (and the taint of their qualification over Ireland on Thierry Henry's handball). It was equally fair for them to elevate Holland, who have been on a tear and are FIFA ranked 3rd in the world.

The other major decision FIFA made was to put the North American teams in Pot #2 with the relatively weak Asia/Oceania teams, rather than with the unseeded but stronger South American or African teams, who went into Pot #3. This was clearly done to enhance the likelihood of African teams making the elimination rounds, but makes it much more difficult for the USA and Mexico, who would have had a high probability of drawing South Africa, the weakest seeded team by far, in the group stage.

From the USA perspective, the best case would be: 1. South Africa (or England, who always suck outside Europe); 3. Paraguay (or Algeria, if #1 is England); and 4. Slovakia or Slovenia. The worst case would be 1. Brazil or Spain; 3. Ivory Coast or Chile; and 4. France or Portugal.

And then there is the proverbial "Group of Death." Every World Cup has one, or at least a debate about which of the several tough groups truly constitutes this cup's Group of Death. The GoD refers to a group in which at least three strong teams are drawn together, meaning that one pre-tournament contender gets sent packing before the elimination round. There's a chance for a Brazil, Mexico, Ivory Coast, Portugal group, or a Spain, USA, Cameroon, France group.

When the dust settles, and we've endured Sepp Blatter, and Charlize Theron, and David Beckham, the freaking Soweto Gospel Choir, Johnny Clegg, et al., at least we'll have a tournament.

12 comments:

  1. I guess they weren't completely without quality outside Europe after all, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello,
    Very informative blog post here... would like to say thanks very much for the share... Keep posting such an interesting blog post.

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks so much for the article. It was pleasant to read what exactly you are up to, but in general I can't match with you seeing that I have several thoughts in my brain. I deem that it is totally unacceptable to act this way in case we are relating to reality. In any case, I wouldn't keep to any of the suggestion you are supplying.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks so much for the article. It was pretty interesting to interpret what namely you are saying, yet on the whole I can't consent with your opinion as I have certain thoughts in my head. I think that it can be totally inadmissible to do in such a way if we're about reality. In any case, I would not go after any of the suggestion you're providing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks so much for having written the article. It was rather interesting to go through exactly what you are writing, although in general I won't consent with your opinion as I have various ideas in my brain. I suppose that it's totally excluded to act like this if we're relating to real life. At least, I wouldn't follow any of the advice you are supplying.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When I saw the title of the post, I was sure that you will speak from a negativist point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The World Cup i think will hold some surprises at the end because the prospects of fresh teams to take a stand is quite high.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To tell you frankly, The world cup draw matters a lot, because if the pool in a world cup contains too many big teams then the real fun wont go away, and eventually the excitement level drops down a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Doing good and really love you web site that is why many visitor will come.

    ReplyDelete
  10. it really looks exciting, when you go through such blogs. the idea is amazing and a draw in any form of the game is unacceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Such a wonderful post. Thanks for the share.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Cool Math Games
    http://thecoolmathgames.com/
    Cool math games have a large collection of gaming stuff find latest online computer games free on this website some cool math games are so simple to play online by the kids these games have great attraction for kids and they meet different targets and bonus points to achieve the specific items in these games.

    ReplyDelete